| |
THE
.22-250
FOR
VARMINTS
***Some
results
I
have
had
with
powders
for
22-250
as
of
8-21-98*** |
|
Here
Mr.
Groundhog.....
(whistle,
whistle) |
|
All
results
are with
the Nosler
55 BT
(moly).
SOME
TYPICAL
NOTES FROM
THE
BEGINNING....
"I
made a new
load this
weekend
for my
Ruger VT
22-250. 35
gr. IMR
4895,
.010"
off the
lands, 55
gr. moly
Blitzking.
Avg.
velocity
3576 fps.,
23 fps
extreme
spread,
shot
.9"
at 200
yards (5
shots).
Three
shots were
one ragged
hole. It's
a killer,
absolutely
dissected
the first
hog I shot
with it
(200
yards). I
was
impressed,
because I
have been
working
with the
slower
powders,
which have
very
impressive
velocity,
but are
inconsistent
for
accuracy
and
spread. I
have one
load of
40.5 gr.
of Win
760, 55
gr.
Blitzking
(3800 fps)
that shot
a ½"
group at
200 yds
with one
flyer, but
the next
group was
about
2"
with the
same load.
That can
be very
frustrating."
I
threw this
in to show
that I
have had
more than
one try at
this thing...
I
didn't
come by this
info easy…
In
fact I
could go
on for
days about
all the
good loads
that I
thought I
had
but did
not prove
out in the
long haul.
What saved
me with
the the
Win 760
load was
backing
the bullet
off of the
lands. I
was
previously
convinced
that all
good
accuracy
would be
found at
less than
.015"
from the
lands.
This is
just not
true! Both
VT's used
in testing
loads
liked the
bullet at
almost
exactly
.025".
With two
different
bullets!
This was
also
suggested
to me by a
Sierra
ballistic
technician.
In fact,
two
different
tech's
said the
same
thing.
.22's like
a little
jump. This
is not
gospel,
but was
certainly
more than
coincidence.
After
we backed
off the
bullet
from the
lands
(incrementally
of course)
BOOM!!!
good
consistency.
Spreads
came down,
flyers
went away,
accuracy
went up. I
would go
back and
try IMR4895
and Accurate
Arms 2520
with these
new ideas
on seating
depth, but
I like the
new
velocities
I am
getting
with Winchester
760
too much!
Frankly,
this load
creation
thing is
hard work.
Especially,
when you
are really
honest
with
yourself
about what
is good,
and what
is not.
Right now,
I would
just be
happy to
see a
groundhog
in my
sights.
|
35
gr.
of
IMR4895
has
shot
well
for
me
off-and-on.
Velocity
was
3575
fps,
and
accuracy
was
as
good
as
.9"
at
200
yards.
I
was
kind
of
shocked
to
see
that
it
seemed
to
be
very
temperature
sensitive.
Fast
shot
strings
showed
velocity
increases
through
the
string
as
the
chamber
heated
up.
This
was
confirmed
on
two
different
Ruger
VT’s.
This
would
not
be
good
for
p-dogs,
but
would
not
hurt
too
much
for
g-hogs,
etc.
Upon
confirmation
with
my
p-dog
hunting
chum
"The
Wapmaster"
who
is
a
self
proclaimed
expert
on
IMR
4895.
He
says
he
has
literally
shot
hundreds
of
pounds
of
the
stuff
in
recent
years.
He
said
the
temperature
sensitivity
could
be
function
of
lot
#.
Some
lots
are
as
much
as
300
fps
different
than
others.
He
has
had
to
watch
the
code
for
the
origin
of
manufacture
very
closely
to
get
good
lots.
A
guy
from
Sierra
said
that
lot
consistency
has
gone
away
since
Dupont
gave
up
production.
An
alternative
may
be
to
go
to
Accurate
Arms
XMR-2495.
This
is
basically
the
same
powder
and
is
probably
manufactured
in
Checkloslovokia.
Accurate
Arms
powders
seem
to
be
pretty
consistent.
I
know
I
have
had
incredible
results
with
XMR-2015BR.
Another
alternative
would
be
H4895.
These
are
all
military
powders. |
|
In
the
beginning,
it
did
not
look
good
for
Accurate
Arms
2520.
It
had
very
good
velocities
(about
3850
fps
max,
and
I
mean
max,
starting
to
show
real
pressure
signs)
but
accuracy
was
not
spectacular
(about
¾
MOA).
I
will
tell
you
what
worried
me
about
AA2520.
It
shot
very
badly
until
it
hit
the
sweet
spot
of
the
gun,
which
was
at
the
max
load.
A
½
gr.
difference
made
a
1
MOA
accuracy
difference.
(At
its
worst,
AA2520
shot
something
like
4
MOA).
This
shows
me
that
the
pressure
curve
for
this
powder
is
very
spiky.
To
give
this
powder
credit,
I
did
not
try
magnum
primers
or
switch
brands
of
primers.
I
always
figured
this
would
have
little,
if
no,
effect
on
accuracy.
The
effects
would
be
strictly
related
to
keeping
velocities
more
consistent.
BOY
WAS
I
WRONG!!!
10-30-98-UPDATE
I
recently
retested
Accurate
Arms
2520
with
the
Fed
215
magnum
primer
and
it
is
very
impressive.
The
primer
really
tucked
the
group
down.
The
groups
are
consistently
good
at
36
grs.
(3/8
to
½-good
conditions).
I
would
give
this
ball
powder
a
go. |
|
Winchester
760
is
currently
the
most
impressive
powder
I
have
used
in
22-250
(to
date).
It
seems
to
be
very
stable
and
extremely
forgiving
(and
not
pressure
sensitive).
What
I
mean
is
that
it
shoots
pretty
well
at
all
reasonable
charges.
It
may
not
perform
spectacular
at
just
any
old
charge,
but
it
won’t
be
real
bad
either.
My
rifle
shoots
1
MOA
or
better
with
everything
between
37
and
40.5
gr.
This
shows
me
that
the
pressure
curve
for
this
powder
is
very
flat,
not
spiky.
This
is
one
of
the
reasons
that
I
wanted
to
make
this
powder
work.
Velocities
are
awesome,
with
no
pressure!
After
switching
to
the
magnum
primer,
I
settled
on
the
max
charge
that
I
was
comfortable
with,
I
do
not
want
an
over-full
case,
in
case
I
choose
to
run
a
batch
on
my
progressive
press.
40.5
gr.
was
full
half
up
the
neck,
so
this
is
where
the
thrower
was
set
for
both
guns
used
in
the
testing
(by
the
way
the
other
gun
was
shooting
52-gr.
Moly
Sierra
match
bullets).
Nosler
55
BT
showed
a
velocity
of
3850
fps,
the
Sierra’s
showed
3950
fps.
The
seating
depth
that
shot
the
best,
for
both
guns,
was
right
at
.025"
from
the
lands.
That’s
right
.025"!
(This
whole
seating
on
the
lands
is
crap,
but
that
is
a
whole
‘nother
conversation).
Accuracy
to
date
is
as
follows:
my
gun
(with
the
Noslers)
shot
.75"
at
200
yds
(last
night).
The
first
three
shots
were
.25"!
Dan’s
gun
has
shot
.9"
at
200
yds,
but
will
improve
with
our
new
sizing
method.
300-yard
groups
are
dependent
on
weather. |
|