EXPLOSIVE ARTICLES: LET'S TALK LANDS... I recently rediscovered my good method for finding the lands on a rifle. I tried the smoke method and it is not quite as accurate (most likely accurate enough for factory rifles) I was never really positive I was in the right place. It also took a lot of time. Well, here it is... Take a fired case that has not been resized. Not resized!!!! The neck will typically be blown out where a bullet will fall through if seated. This is a perfect place to start. Next, oblong the case neck opening slightly by slightly pinching the neck-----only slightly (I use my teeth, it is more precise). Create enough tension in the neck that a bullet can be pushed in and pulled out by hand if wrapped in a paper towel for grip. I think it feels like a shock on a car. That kind of tension…. In other word the bullet moves relatively easy, in mechanical terms at least, but will stay if measured in a caliper. Take about 15 samples of seating depth and I bet there will not be .002" difference in the whole lot. ----->By the way, I use a bullet comparator (12 bucks). It is worth it's weight in gold.<----- I have compared the "push" method to the smoke method. Actually, I should have said that I had used the smoke method and the marks-a-lot method. I feel they are about one-in-the-same. I used a dry erase marker. This was still very time consuming and (just my opinion) less accurate. I think the secret, no matter what method you use, (for example using the Dremel slit method) is to get enough neck tension to secure the bullet, without allowing the ogive of the bullet to pass absolute land contact. I do know that a sized neck, no matter if it only a 1/16" has too much tension, and the bullet is actually allowed to enter the tapered part of the throat. I have performed samples using the sized neck method that are consistent. That is where the confusion began! They are consistently way-long (.030" to .050"-depending on the gun), compared to the "push method" or the "smoke method". I know I have developed loads that shot pretty well, that must have been shoved into the lands. Some bench guys do it all the time. It just goes against all the good reloading manuals as being the optimum situation, so I avoid contact for hunting.
EXPLANATION: I think that the 22-250 is especially vulnerable to this growing effect because of the tapered neck, body and shallow shoulder angle (and the fact my new loads are honking on!). It seems that the velocity jumps are associated with a crush in the shoulder that pinches the bullet in the neck, substantially varying bullet pull. In fact, using this crush in the neck-splitting-finding-the-distance-from-the-lands-technique proves this. In this technique, a hard closing, tight case is used to achieve crush, (to create a pliers-like effect) so that the bullet is not left in the lands of the rifle upon the closing of the bolt (but is free to move the rest of the time). Now that this is said, keep in mind that high-power shooters with bolt guns do this all over the country with obviously very consistently good results (these guys can shoot!!! Try holding less than a MOA out to 600 yds. with a peep sight). High Power bolt guns have chambers more similar to most factory rifles than, say, a benchrest gun. Bench rest shooters (who advocate neck sizing all the time) use non-typical cambers in their guns to achieve very tight fits. They also use very straight-walled cartridges with very steep shoulder angles (like the PPC). Again, I will say that the common shooter could learn a lot from high-power, probably more than benchrest (unless you have very deep pockets). Take a 2 liter Pepsi bottle and the base o-ring from a Lee die. Use a Dremel or drill to grind a hole in the top of the cap that is larger than the o-ring but small enough to keep the o-ring sealed between the tightened cap and the bottle. Slide the bottle over the end of the barrel and the o-ring will hold it in place with a press fit. . This will be a good seal on a Varmint barrel OD. Run patches and solvent through your barrel at will. No mess! No stink either. YOU DON'T NEED AN EXPENSIVE PIECE OF SOFTWARE TO PERFORM BALLISTIC CALCULATIONS. SOME NICE FELLA HAS PROVIDED IT ON THE WEB FOR FREE. IT WORKS VERY WELL...TRY IT OUT.
I moly all my own rifle bullets. It seems to basically prevent any significant fouling. Even though, when I went on my first prairie dog hunt ,there was a lot of fouling when I got home. I don't think anything will stop the copper with that many rounds shot, in that short of time (750 ROUNDS IN THREE DAYS). After using a cleaning brush and Sweet's solvent, everything was Corsair blue. It was clean after two brushings, though. Took about 1/2 an hour. In regards to this, I have some advice on cleaning barrels using moly ALWAYS. I called Berger about a question on moly and bullet pull (another subject). I figured if anyone knew moly, it was Berger. This led to the tech asking about my cleaning procedure. I told him how I cleaned, and said "well there's you problem". He said moly barrels are not to be cleaned like non-moly barrels. SWEET'S WAS RIGHT OUT! Here it is...
I though this sounded a little optimistic, but I have stuck to this religiously. I do not use Kroil, I use penetrating oil. (Rem Oil, wd-40) this clears carbon fouling very well! The bores of my rifles have gotten to be glass smooth inside. My .223 is the best, it has never shot an uncoated bullet. Hogkiller's 22-250 has about 400 rounds through it, and all he has ever done is run a little Hoppe's powder solvent through the bore, after about every 100 rounds. That is about the standard for cleaning with moly FOR US, about every hundred rounds. Some of the best groups in a days shooting will be at the end of the day! I do not clean at the range anymore... FROM WALT BERGER: How
do I clean
my rifle
when using
Moly
Coated
bullets?
Another
good idea
is to
vigorously
lap your
barrel.
Use
JB or Rem
paste,
about (10)
patches
(20)
strokes
per patch
(lotsa
work).
Clean with
penetrating
oil. Moly
coat the
barrel
with (5)
fowlers.
Use JB's
for
cleaning
for the
next (400)
rounds. At
this
point, you
could
start to
see very
little
need for
any
vigorous
cleaning. From: "Z. Ohanian" (zareh@utcc.utoronto.ca) The goal is to polish the bore in order to improve accuracy/consistency of shots. One will also benefit from ease of cleaning,less fouling and longer accuracy life before any cleaning is required. I use RemClean to polish the bore, Remington rifles tend to have rough bores (about 2/3 do) and this is my solution to problem. I have since started to do this to all my match barrel and I have only seen improvements, if not in accuracy in ease of cleaning, less fouling per number of shots ... Shake the RemClean well, use a tight fitting patch and a rod guide. Insert the soaked patch in the bore. The goal is to polish the bore and not to disturb (or create ramps as one enters and exits) the crown and the throat of the rifle. Place the rifle in such a manner that it is against a wall, I place a rag at the muzzle to dampen the blow of the rod, there you have your muzzle stopper. I place my leg in a position as to stop the rod from exiting the bore. This ensures that you will keep that patch in the bore and you will not exit and re-enter the bore 60-80 times. If you care for visual assistance use a magic marker and mark your rod at the end of each stroke, mark it about 1.5" before it actually exits the bore as to give yourself a time to react (on SS rods use electric or masking tape). One needs to inspect the bore before you decide how much polishing is required (experience will help here). The bore should be mirror like, if not you need polishing (I would do it even for a mirror like bore that fouls after 10 shots (you can see the copper streaks when looking at the bore at the muzzle end, look sideways). I push and pull 20 times, I change the patch to a newly soaked patch with couple of dry/clean patches to clean what you just did. For a rough bore I do this four times (about 80 push and pulls, the barrel will actually heat-up at little from this if you do it fast). I change the patch every 20 strokes with couple of clean ones in between. Once I am satisfied I pass few clean patches through. I then clean the chamber (use a pencil with Kleenix around it, nice and thick to a nipple..). Clean the guide rod too, inside and out before inserting it back into the action. You do not want it to give you a false reading on the patch (most people clean a clean bore because they see dirt on the patch which is coming from the guide and not the bore). I then rap Kleenex (tissue paper) around the jag and I use it to finish my cleaning. Tissue paper is soft and it conforms to the land/grooves well and it removes the residue at the base of the rifling (which is missed by the patch). I roll the Kleenex on the jag like a cigarette and then I roll it the other way (use both sides of the same piece). I clean until there is no more thin, black streaks coming out. I then oil the rifle IF I AM NOT GOING TO SHOOT IT FOR MANY MONTHS, if not I leave it as it is. A polished bore would not foul as fast, it will be very easy to clean and would not walk the shots as much as a non polished bore. I have shot my magnum in the provincial (4 days of shooting) and then I took it to our monthly sniper match without cleaning. I did not notice any accuracy degradation after 250 shots of HOT magnum loads with 220 gr match bullets. It then took me about 20 minutes to clean the rifle, fast and easy. I then shoot one round and clean the barrel with Shooter's choice (or your favorite ammonia cleaner), I do that for 10 shots I then clean with RemClean again, I then shoot 3 shots and clean in between the shots (7 times) and then I shoot four 5 shot groups with cleaning between each group. hence the barrel is broken in with 10+21+20=51 shots. I have found that polishing improves accuracy (consistency mainly, you do not get those nasty flyers anymore), the bore does not foul easily, it is really easy to clean and the accuracy of the rifle last lot longer before a cleaning is required. Now, to address carbon fouling. I am going to just say this. Carbon fouling in the first part of the barrel could be a function of the powder type or load combustion. I have seen a marked improvement in carbon deposits since I switched to a much hotter load. Actually, hotter may not be the effect at all. I switched powders and I feel the new hotter loads, with the new powder, burns much cleaner. I always clean the first foot of the barrel about three times as much as the rest of the barrel. I have found that JB's cleans this, as long as is attacked regularly and vigorously. I have tried leaving excess moly on my bullets. I figured you can't have too much of a good thing right? Well, not really... My main technique is to clean briefly with corn cob to make all the bullets shiny silver after coating. I started thinking that this coating looked a little thin. As an experiment I started leaving the moly dust coating on the bullets. It was my first impression, that this dust acted as good protective coating and lube as the bullet is being seated. A thin coating will be partially stripped as the bullet is seated, unless one is really anal about polishing the inside of the case necks. It was proposed that the best solution would be to have a dusty coating of moly. This is basically what Hornady factory moly looks like. This seemed to leave the most moly on the base of the bullet. I shared this train of thought with some people on the NET, and I got one really informed response that said he tried the same thing. He had good data that said this started leading to some real funnies...So I quit. The rounds that I did shoot sure made a black hole going through the target.
I have
been
exploring
the
quality of
my
handloading,
in the
search for
that last
little bit
of
performance
gain. One
of the
things
that came
under
scrutiny
was the
ammunition
runout.
Once a
RCBS
runout
gauge was
acquired,
the
examination
began,
keeping in
mind some
of the
things I
had read
about dies
and
runout. I
fully
expected
my
standard
Hornady
dies to
come into
suspect.
Well, to
make a
long story
short, I
see no
problem
with the
Hornady
dies… My
Winchester
case necks
will size
to
.001"
runout
(once
sorted).
Bullet
runout
stays
about
.005".
The seater
is fitted
with the
add-on
dial
gauge.
.005"
is not too
bad,
everyone
told me
the cure
would be a
Redding
seater.
Well, that
couldn't
hurt, but
I don't
think it
would be a
cure. BY THE WAY! THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE IN TOLERANCES BETWEEN RCBS "COMPETITION" AND "STANDARD" DIES. Call RCBS and ask them. The "comp" dies just have more features. The die bases are the same. I think that is a little misleading myself. So, to improve my overall case concentricity, I have invested in one expensive piece of equipment. Norma brass! I felt this would give the best overall improvement for the money. Boy was I right. My first batch of brass was really impressive. I have been a Winchester brass man for almost two years solid, and have always been very satisfied with its consistency and durability in 22-250, but Norma smokes Winchester when it comes to consistency numbers. Bullet runout went down to .000"-.003" without changing anything else! 20% had .000" runout. Well, too bad its winter now and I am not really doing any testing, because if runout has a substantial effect on groups, there should be a measurable improvement. I will say this, I piece of mind is worth a few more dollars on those one-shot kills, buy a 100 rounds of Norma brass for a season. These things require very little prep at all. I didn't even trim! I just gave everything a real hard chamfer with a Lyman VLD reamer, cleaned up the edges and started seating primers. That's pretty cool.... |